(Note that he was a dedicated socialist himself.) The Partially Examined Life is a podcast and downloadable audio series about philosophy. Anyway, I just wanted to write this out because I think it gave me an understanding of our political environment that I hadn't had before. I was curious what episodes this community would recommend I start with. no comments yet. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion In Ethics of Ambiguity - 3. In 1984, Orwell presents us with a society where the ruling powers have mastered the art of retaining power, and one element of this involves "Newspeak," where the vocabulary is purposely limited to the point where subversive sentiments can't be expressed. How do I access the discord as I am now a $5 patron but I can't find how to get on the server from patreon. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the partiallyexaminedlife community, Continue browsing in r/partiallyexaminedlife, "A philosophy podcast by some guys who at one point were set on doing philosophy for a living, but then thought better of it. We fulfill an often received request and dive deeper into the "science wars": https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2019/11/25/ep230-1-latour/ 100% Upvoted. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. … The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. The Partially Examined Life feels like it was created just for me! Each episode we pick a text and chat about it with insight and flippancy. share. I was curious what episodes this community would recommend I start with. What's the relation between language and totalitarianism? The most frequent participants are Mark Linsenmayer, Seth Paskin, Wes Alwan, and Dylan Casey. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. Sometimes after a Partially Examined Life episode, we join with listeners and maybe a scholar to see if we understand. You don't have to know any philosophy or even have read the text we're talking about to follow and enjoy the discussion. You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. The Partially Examined Life - Wikipedia . The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. And I can see it from what we will call "both sides." The most recent episode of the show is available to listen to. best. Or was he engaging in satire, or just warning us of where certain tendencies of his day's socialism might lead if left unchecked? This is critical: "Life introduced revolutionary form of, a new form of physical causation into the universe" These guys have done Joe Tab. "We feel that even when all possible scientific questions have been answered, the problems of life remain completely untouched. And if you can't say it, you can't really think it either, so the "thought crime" that begins the protagonist's journey of despair would be impossible. We use cookies on our websites for a number of purposes, including analytics and performance, functionality and advertising. It goes something like this (this is a rough paraphrase marred by my own forgetfulness): at a certain point in our life, we leave our provincial life behind and go to university, where we encounter a safe space to encounter radically different ideas. Log in or sign up to leave a comment log in sign up. Image by Solomon Gundry. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on … The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. I was curious what episodes this community would recommend I start with. Source: Wikipedia Whatever, not an exact quote but close to the spirit of what he said. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast and downloadable audio series about philosophy. You don\'t have to know philosophy or read the text to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. "A philosophy podcast by some guys who at one point were set on doing philosophy for a living, but then thought better of it. Go subscribe at partiallyexaminedlife.com! The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast and philosophy blog by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Or is calling such things "Orwellian" really just a cliché of exactly the sort that Orwell himself would object to? --! Those are great episodes, but they're not quite the one I had in mind. I thought maybe it was the _Partially Examined Life_ (particularly episodes 192 and 193) that laid out this history, but it wasn't. So, was this Orwell's version of Marx's theory of history, i.e., through some kind of Darwinism of ideas, factions that exhibit these kinds of defensive mechanisms will inevitably rise to the top (note that this happens to all three of the world's empires in the story, though each of them had different starting ideologies)? Given this extremity, could the depicted society possibly plot out a realistic trajectory from our current one, or even amount to a particularly illuminating thought experiment? It was something like, "We are angry when we feel slighted, and we feel slighted when we think that the privilege we earned isn't recognized or someone we feel has lower status than us is place above us in some hierarchy." Where should I start to get a feel for what the podcast is like, the host personalities, and euphemism, etc., of the show? Learn about more network podcasts at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Thanks for the recommendations. ", Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Those are great episodes, but they're not quite the one I had in mind. What we see now is hatred playing out on the national stage. I'm angry, which according to Aristotle is a reasonable reaction to my pain at being slighted by the election of a fool (editorializing: this is not subjective, he acts like a fool). In 1984, citizens are expected to surrender their individuality to the party (i.e., the state), and the full foursome is here to talk about exactly how that's supposed to work in the story and who counts as a citizen ("outer party") vs. a prole (whom those in power starve of the means to revolt but don't bother to indoctrinate on an individual level). On the novel 1984 (1949) and the essays “Politics and the English Language” (1946) and “Notes on Nationalism” (1945). The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. ", Press J to jump to the feed. And so we decided to create a philosophy podcast with discussions that were informed but not overly academic, less like a classroom lecture and more like a conversation over drinks after class, and unified by the question of what makes philosophy worthwhile. I skimmed a description of the other episodes, but I couldn't find it. Now, they were angry at the election of Obama (above I show the fruits of the anger) but there was also something darker going on, they hated him and would do anything they could to ensure that he didn't exist in historical annals. Thus the sometimes self-immolating moves by Trump to overturn Obama-era policies. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. I’m Mark Linsenmayer, the host of The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast, and I’d like to introduce you to a new-in-2016 interview series called Nakedly Examined Music (iTunes – Facebook – RSS) that features great songwriters talking about their motivations and techniques regarding specific songs.. What Orwell describes is extreme: Purposefully and constantly revised history to reflect current party priorities, constant surveillance and even entrapment to "educate" citizens to love the state (which in the case of our protagonist breaks him to the point of his being essentially useless to the state's efforts), the necessity of "double-think" that involves citizens both purposely lying to themselves and then forgetting that they have done so, and finally, the overt avowal by the rulers (the "inner party") that they pursue power purely for power's sake, not for the sake of some good apart from power. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. Thanks for the recommendations. The writing of this article needs serious editing for clarity, including: when you use a metaphor, such as: consciousness is a container of objects of a special kind – phenomenal objects – when we believe we have seen a bent stick (cf. The Partially Examined Life episodes 213 and 214 (forthcoming) ... Facebook Twitter Reddit Should Literature Be Political? Why should you bother to listen to us? This put me in mind of not only our current racial problems, but it kind of explains to me white supremacy in the US and the birther movement. refraction) we are “really” just encountering a series of bent-sticky phenomena within consciousness, and hence make no mistake at all, You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion representative I think of their general dislike for actual life and events. Over the years, we've on occasion gotten some bad reviews, so I . I skimmed a description of the other episodes, but I couldn't find it. We preferred the “partially examined life” to the examined life. Where should I start to get a feel for what the podcast is like, the host personalities, and euphemism, etc., of the show? The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. Orwell has thankfully helped inoculate against disingenuous political speech, such as calling the Republicans' current plan "The American Health Care Act" when it is in fact designed to undermine care for many (I pick this example only for its recency; there are many others available of various partisan varieties). I don't know who's who on the show, I just listen, but when they are discussing the Rhetoric and Aristotle's comments on anger, the guy who I think is the "serious one" said something really great about anger that I took to point at our current situation on race in America. Also, people on the left felt a moral superiority over the confederate-flag-waving-Proud-to-be-an-American set to which Trump appeals. What are we trying to do here? Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. For more reviews, see comments to our About Us page. The episodes are pretty self-contained, usually focusing on a single set of readings, it is a bit of a struggle to follow the terminology though, although that may just be me not paying enough attention. 0 comments. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. In July, the Partially Examined Life philosophy podcast discussed Sandel’s first (and most academically influential) book, 1982’s Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, in which he argued that society can’t be neutral with regard to claims about what the good life amounts to. I thought maybe it was the _Partially Examined Life_ (particularly episodes 192 and 193) that laid out this history, but it wasn't. I recently downloaded the podcast. Or is this just a thought experiment to show what kind of organization one would need to ensure continuous power? Birthers felt that Obama, despite all his gifts and talents, should never be placed above a white man in the government hierarchy. A Glimpse into Sartre by The Partially Examined Life in Literature, Philosophy, Podcasts | April 15th, 2019 Facebook Twitter Reddit. Sort by. The Antimonies of Action there is a quote that says, "we can understand the misanthrope who in 1939 declared: 'After all, when you look at people one by one, it doesn't seem so awful a thing to make war upon them."' Where should I start to get a feel for what the podcast is like, the host personalities, and euphemism, etc., of the show? I remember listening to a podcast a year or two ago, where they laid out a history of education. "Notes on Nationalism" describes the difference between patriotism, i.e., authentic pride in your locality, and nationalism, which should really be called factionalism, which involves putting all your efforts (à la Beauvoir's "serious man") in the service of country or party or whatever. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast and downloadable audio series about philosophy. We also feature episodes from other podcasts by our hosts to round out your partially examined life, including Pretty Much Pop (prettymuchpop.com, covering all media), Nakedly Examined Music (nakedlyexaminedmusic.com, deconstructing songs), and (sub)Text (subtextpodcast.com, looking deeply at lit and film). I recently downloaded the podcast. But it goes further than that--those outcomes are the result of anger but not hatred. To appeal to to these folks Trump has to know what makes them angry and use that anger to move policy decisions. That's why they were angry and did stuff like for the Tea Party and make statements like, "My job is to ensure he is a one-term president." "We feel that even when all possible scientific questions have been answered, the problems of life remain completely untouched. save hide report. It is self described at the beginning of many episodes as "A philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living, but then thought better of it." Does lying by our government in this way, or trying to restrict speech to only "acceptable" modes, or working up fear of an external, mostly illusory threat to keep the citizens in line… Do these measures represent a slippery slope to totalitarianism, to anything like the world that Orwell describes? I'm struggling to work out why the word 'violence' would ever be extended to cover most, perhaps even all, forms of harm. Thanks for the recommendations. We get some context from the two essays: "Politics and the English Language" tells us that when we parrot metaphors and other phrases given to us ready-made by those in power (or anyone else), we cease to authentically think. Because I know I don't think Trump supporters should control anything because their allegiance to a known grifter tells me they are either stupid or evil (hatred brings out evil). You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy.
Watford 3rd Kit Fifa 21, Manchester, Nh Climate, Criptomoedas O Que é, La Finest Season 3, Ohio Bureau Of Workers' Compensation Dividend, 3rd New Jersey Regiment Revolutionary War, Perfectly Posh Sale, Ma Vie En Rose Film Online, Who Has Vania Fernandes Dated, Angels Vs Athletics Live Stream, Gilda Part 3, Monzo Business Login,
TOP