See all of the winners. I was unhurt, mostly. The data presented is for information purposes only.
Rubber soles are a growing trend in the alpine market as well, which might make require replacing a non MNC binding in the next few years if you upgrade boots.
Marker’s flagship Jester binding is still the industry standard for all-mountain … The biggest reason to choose the Warden over the STH2 is if you intend to routinely use AT boots with 9523 boot soles (i.e., not WTR, Grip Walk, or standard alpine soles) because these types of boots require an MNC (multi-norm compatible) binding like the Warden.
We’ve also found that the Tyrolia heels are much easier to open and close, especially in soft snow, than any of the Marker Royal Family bindings, and the Tyrolia bindings don’t have the issue we’ve experienced with some Marker bindings where the heel closes part way but does not completely lock. The metal-plated AFD provides both strong power transfer from boot to ski, as well as a high level of durability compared to plastic options found elsewhere.
These are very similar to the STH2 16, and like the 16-DIN version, they’re much easier to click into in deep snow than any of the Marker bindings we’ve used. First, the rotating heel piece of the Pivot bindings can be a bit of a nuisance in deep snow. For more on elasticity, travel, DIN, etc. The mechanism is solid, and does not result in a difference in toe height (boot angle). If so, what are the implications of the low height of the Attacks for ordinary resort skiing? We have, however, had a few pre-release issues with STH 13’s when set at the higher end of their DIN range, so if you are running your DIN at 11, 12, or 13, you might consider bumping up to the STH2 16. You don't have to race in PyeongChang to enjoy the best ski technology ever made. Toe wing adjustment to grip front of the ski boot – at what point is it set correctly? Modern release value settings are now standardized by the International Standards Organization (ISO). Hey Troy, Speaking from the perspective of a rocky mtn ski shop, I have not had many issue with the griffons that I can remember. That is the only Attack binding compatible with WTR available for retail. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The Warden’s toe piece doesn’t clear snow as well as the STH2, but the Warden still seems easier to step into in deep snow than the Jester. But once you learn how to do it (or if you aren’t frequently swapping boots or adjusting your DIN settings) then this is a minor factor or a non-factor. With better compatibility, bindings are blurring the lines between alpine and alpine touring. SKI highly recommends only skiing in boots and bindings with the same ISO compatibility and have been properly installed and adjusted by a professional ski technician.
If anyone could help plug that knowledge gap I assume it would be you guys. I can tell you about the ease of use of the knee bindings…they are very difficult.
I'd say go for 16 if you are either over 150 lbs, aggressive/expert skier, or both.
I read that marker has a complaint from the European community for dangerous attacks.
If you are light, or small, it can be impossible to click in the heel. The oversized toe piece wings swallow the front of the boot, providing seamless energy transmission to the ski when paired with the beefy heel piece. We've also listed alternative bindings that use similar technology of those reviewed but have different release values to accommodate different body shapes, abilities, and budgets. So Salomon STH2 WTR 13 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Marker Jester 16, as seen on the chart below. My boot can move up and down in toe piece and causes a clicking sensation. Enjoys skiing fast & craft beer. Most binding heel pieces need to be adjusted to accommodate different boot sole lengths, which is commonly called a binding’s forward pressure. This binding was awarded a SKI Editor's Choice award in 2019. A new binding that is potentially the missing variable for the one-ski, one-boot equation for uphill skiing enthusiasts.
Hi, I just bought some of the new Revolt 121s (so stoked) and am looking for some bindings to put on them. We’ve also included some of our reviewers’ personal experiences with some of these bindings, and we’ll continue to update this piece as more bindings hit the market, and as we are able to get more time testing some of these bindings. No warranties in the past few years that I can think of, and I like the binding a lot as long as you don’t have a super thick touring sole. As you guys get deeper on this topic, I would love for some more information on differences in binding safety. The old (non-WTR or Grip Walk) Look Pivot 14 was a favorite of many Blister reviewers, thanks to its elasticity and consistent release. But the Tyrolia toe doesn’t clear snow as easily as the Salomon STH2. Blister, not a single comment about movement in the toe piece? It’s only compatible with alpine and Grip Walk soles, but it’s got a very good range of adjustment to fit different boot sole lengths, as well as a low stack height.
Rubber soles are a growing trend in the alpine market as well, which might make require replacing a non MNC binding in the next few years if you upgrade boots.
Marker’s flagship Jester binding is still the industry standard for all-mountain … The biggest reason to choose the Warden over the STH2 is if you intend to routinely use AT boots with 9523 boot soles (i.e., not WTR, Grip Walk, or standard alpine soles) because these types of boots require an MNC (multi-norm compatible) binding like the Warden.
We’ve also found that the Tyrolia heels are much easier to open and close, especially in soft snow, than any of the Marker Royal Family bindings, and the Tyrolia bindings don’t have the issue we’ve experienced with some Marker bindings where the heel closes part way but does not completely lock. The metal-plated AFD provides both strong power transfer from boot to ski, as well as a high level of durability compared to plastic options found elsewhere.
These are very similar to the STH2 16, and like the 16-DIN version, they’re much easier to click into in deep snow than any of the Marker bindings we’ve used. First, the rotating heel piece of the Pivot bindings can be a bit of a nuisance in deep snow. For more on elasticity, travel, DIN, etc. The mechanism is solid, and does not result in a difference in toe height (boot angle). If so, what are the implications of the low height of the Attacks for ordinary resort skiing? We have, however, had a few pre-release issues with STH 13’s when set at the higher end of their DIN range, so if you are running your DIN at 11, 12, or 13, you might consider bumping up to the STH2 16. You don't have to race in PyeongChang to enjoy the best ski technology ever made. Toe wing adjustment to grip front of the ski boot – at what point is it set correctly? Modern release value settings are now standardized by the International Standards Organization (ISO). Hey Troy, Speaking from the perspective of a rocky mtn ski shop, I have not had many issue with the griffons that I can remember. That is the only Attack binding compatible with WTR available for retail. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The Warden’s toe piece doesn’t clear snow as well as the STH2, but the Warden still seems easier to step into in deep snow than the Jester. But once you learn how to do it (or if you aren’t frequently swapping boots or adjusting your DIN settings) then this is a minor factor or a non-factor. With better compatibility, bindings are blurring the lines between alpine and alpine touring. SKI highly recommends only skiing in boots and bindings with the same ISO compatibility and have been properly installed and adjusted by a professional ski technician.
If anyone could help plug that knowledge gap I assume it would be you guys. I can tell you about the ease of use of the knee bindings…they are very difficult.
I'd say go for 16 if you are either over 150 lbs, aggressive/expert skier, or both.
I read that marker has a complaint from the European community for dangerous attacks.
If you are light, or small, it can be impossible to click in the heel. The oversized toe piece wings swallow the front of the boot, providing seamless energy transmission to the ski when paired with the beefy heel piece. We've also listed alternative bindings that use similar technology of those reviewed but have different release values to accommodate different body shapes, abilities, and budgets. So Salomon STH2 WTR 13 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Marker Jester 16, as seen on the chart below. My boot can move up and down in toe piece and causes a clicking sensation. Enjoys skiing fast & craft beer. Most binding heel pieces need to be adjusted to accommodate different boot sole lengths, which is commonly called a binding’s forward pressure. This binding was awarded a SKI Editor's Choice award in 2019. A new binding that is potentially the missing variable for the one-ski, one-boot equation for uphill skiing enthusiasts.
Hi, I just bought some of the new Revolt 121s (so stoked) and am looking for some bindings to put on them. We’ve also included some of our reviewers’ personal experiences with some of these bindings, and we’ll continue to update this piece as more bindings hit the market, and as we are able to get more time testing some of these bindings. No warranties in the past few years that I can think of, and I like the binding a lot as long as you don’t have a super thick touring sole. As you guys get deeper on this topic, I would love for some more information on differences in binding safety. The old (non-WTR or Grip Walk) Look Pivot 14 was a favorite of many Blister reviewers, thanks to its elasticity and consistent release. But the Tyrolia toe doesn’t clear snow as easily as the Salomon STH2. Blister, not a single comment about movement in the toe piece? It’s only compatible with alpine and Grip Walk soles, but it’s got a very good range of adjustment to fit different boot sole lengths, as well as a low stack height.
Rubber soles are a growing trend in the alpine market as well, which might make require replacing a non MNC binding in the next few years if you upgrade boots.
Marker’s flagship Jester binding is still the industry standard for all-mountain … The biggest reason to choose the Warden over the STH2 is if you intend to routinely use AT boots with 9523 boot soles (i.e., not WTR, Grip Walk, or standard alpine soles) because these types of boots require an MNC (multi-norm compatible) binding like the Warden.
We’ve also found that the Tyrolia heels are much easier to open and close, especially in soft snow, than any of the Marker Royal Family bindings, and the Tyrolia bindings don’t have the issue we’ve experienced with some Marker bindings where the heel closes part way but does not completely lock. The metal-plated AFD provides both strong power transfer from boot to ski, as well as a high level of durability compared to plastic options found elsewhere.
These are very similar to the STH2 16, and like the 16-DIN version, they’re much easier to click into in deep snow than any of the Marker bindings we’ve used. First, the rotating heel piece of the Pivot bindings can be a bit of a nuisance in deep snow. For more on elasticity, travel, DIN, etc. The mechanism is solid, and does not result in a difference in toe height (boot angle). If so, what are the implications of the low height of the Attacks for ordinary resort skiing? We have, however, had a few pre-release issues with STH 13’s when set at the higher end of their DIN range, so if you are running your DIN at 11, 12, or 13, you might consider bumping up to the STH2 16. You don't have to race in PyeongChang to enjoy the best ski technology ever made. Toe wing adjustment to grip front of the ski boot – at what point is it set correctly? Modern release value settings are now standardized by the International Standards Organization (ISO). Hey Troy, Speaking from the perspective of a rocky mtn ski shop, I have not had many issue with the griffons that I can remember. That is the only Attack binding compatible with WTR available for retail. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The Warden’s toe piece doesn’t clear snow as well as the STH2, but the Warden still seems easier to step into in deep snow than the Jester. But once you learn how to do it (or if you aren’t frequently swapping boots or adjusting your DIN settings) then this is a minor factor or a non-factor. With better compatibility, bindings are blurring the lines between alpine and alpine touring. SKI highly recommends only skiing in boots and bindings with the same ISO compatibility and have been properly installed and adjusted by a professional ski technician.
If anyone could help plug that knowledge gap I assume it would be you guys. I can tell you about the ease of use of the knee bindings…they are very difficult.
I'd say go for 16 if you are either over 150 lbs, aggressive/expert skier, or both.
I read that marker has a complaint from the European community for dangerous attacks.
If you are light, or small, it can be impossible to click in the heel. The oversized toe piece wings swallow the front of the boot, providing seamless energy transmission to the ski when paired with the beefy heel piece. We've also listed alternative bindings that use similar technology of those reviewed but have different release values to accommodate different body shapes, abilities, and budgets. So Salomon STH2 WTR 13 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Marker Jester 16, as seen on the chart below. My boot can move up and down in toe piece and causes a clicking sensation. Enjoys skiing fast & craft beer. Most binding heel pieces need to be adjusted to accommodate different boot sole lengths, which is commonly called a binding’s forward pressure. This binding was awarded a SKI Editor's Choice award in 2019. A new binding that is potentially the missing variable for the one-ski, one-boot equation for uphill skiing enthusiasts.
Hi, I just bought some of the new Revolt 121s (so stoked) and am looking for some bindings to put on them. We’ve also included some of our reviewers’ personal experiences with some of these bindings, and we’ll continue to update this piece as more bindings hit the market, and as we are able to get more time testing some of these bindings. No warranties in the past few years that I can think of, and I like the binding a lot as long as you don’t have a super thick touring sole. As you guys get deeper on this topic, I would love for some more information on differences in binding safety. The old (non-WTR or Grip Walk) Look Pivot 14 was a favorite of many Blister reviewers, thanks to its elasticity and consistent release. But the Tyrolia toe doesn’t clear snow as easily as the Salomon STH2. Blister, not a single comment about movement in the toe piece? It’s only compatible with alpine and Grip Walk soles, but it’s got a very good range of adjustment to fit different boot sole lengths, as well as a low stack height.
Rubber soles are a growing trend in the alpine market as well, which might make require replacing a non MNC binding in the next few years if you upgrade boots.
Marker’s flagship Jester binding is still the industry standard for all-mountain … The biggest reason to choose the Warden over the STH2 is if you intend to routinely use AT boots with 9523 boot soles (i.e., not WTR, Grip Walk, or standard alpine soles) because these types of boots require an MNC (multi-norm compatible) binding like the Warden.
We’ve also found that the Tyrolia heels are much easier to open and close, especially in soft snow, than any of the Marker Royal Family bindings, and the Tyrolia bindings don’t have the issue we’ve experienced with some Marker bindings where the heel closes part way but does not completely lock. The metal-plated AFD provides both strong power transfer from boot to ski, as well as a high level of durability compared to plastic options found elsewhere.
These are very similar to the STH2 16, and like the 16-DIN version, they’re much easier to click into in deep snow than any of the Marker bindings we’ve used. First, the rotating heel piece of the Pivot bindings can be a bit of a nuisance in deep snow. For more on elasticity, travel, DIN, etc. The mechanism is solid, and does not result in a difference in toe height (boot angle). If so, what are the implications of the low height of the Attacks for ordinary resort skiing? We have, however, had a few pre-release issues with STH 13’s when set at the higher end of their DIN range, so if you are running your DIN at 11, 12, or 13, you might consider bumping up to the STH2 16. You don't have to race in PyeongChang to enjoy the best ski technology ever made. Toe wing adjustment to grip front of the ski boot – at what point is it set correctly? Modern release value settings are now standardized by the International Standards Organization (ISO). Hey Troy, Speaking from the perspective of a rocky mtn ski shop, I have not had many issue with the griffons that I can remember. That is the only Attack binding compatible with WTR available for retail. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The Warden’s toe piece doesn’t clear snow as well as the STH2, but the Warden still seems easier to step into in deep snow than the Jester. But once you learn how to do it (or if you aren’t frequently swapping boots or adjusting your DIN settings) then this is a minor factor or a non-factor. With better compatibility, bindings are blurring the lines between alpine and alpine touring. SKI highly recommends only skiing in boots and bindings with the same ISO compatibility and have been properly installed and adjusted by a professional ski technician.
If anyone could help plug that knowledge gap I assume it would be you guys. I can tell you about the ease of use of the knee bindings…they are very difficult.
I'd say go for 16 if you are either over 150 lbs, aggressive/expert skier, or both.
I read that marker has a complaint from the European community for dangerous attacks.
If you are light, or small, it can be impossible to click in the heel. The oversized toe piece wings swallow the front of the boot, providing seamless energy transmission to the ski when paired with the beefy heel piece. We've also listed alternative bindings that use similar technology of those reviewed but have different release values to accommodate different body shapes, abilities, and budgets. So Salomon STH2 WTR 13 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Marker Jester 16, as seen on the chart below. My boot can move up and down in toe piece and causes a clicking sensation. Enjoys skiing fast & craft beer. Most binding heel pieces need to be adjusted to accommodate different boot sole lengths, which is commonly called a binding’s forward pressure. This binding was awarded a SKI Editor's Choice award in 2019. A new binding that is potentially the missing variable for the one-ski, one-boot equation for uphill skiing enthusiasts.
Hi, I just bought some of the new Revolt 121s (so stoked) and am looking for some bindings to put on them. We’ve also included some of our reviewers’ personal experiences with some of these bindings, and we’ll continue to update this piece as more bindings hit the market, and as we are able to get more time testing some of these bindings. No warranties in the past few years that I can think of, and I like the binding a lot as long as you don’t have a super thick touring sole. As you guys get deeper on this topic, I would love for some more information on differences in binding safety. The old (non-WTR or Grip Walk) Look Pivot 14 was a favorite of many Blister reviewers, thanks to its elasticity and consistent release. But the Tyrolia toe doesn’t clear snow as easily as the Salomon STH2. Blister, not a single comment about movement in the toe piece? It’s only compatible with alpine and Grip Walk soles, but it’s got a very good range of adjustment to fit different boot sole lengths, as well as a low stack height.
Rubber soles are a growing trend in the alpine market as well, which might make require replacing a non MNC binding in the next few years if you upgrade boots.
Marker’s flagship Jester binding is still the industry standard for all-mountain … The biggest reason to choose the Warden over the STH2 is if you intend to routinely use AT boots with 9523 boot soles (i.e., not WTR, Grip Walk, or standard alpine soles) because these types of boots require an MNC (multi-norm compatible) binding like the Warden.
We’ve also found that the Tyrolia heels are much easier to open and close, especially in soft snow, than any of the Marker Royal Family bindings, and the Tyrolia bindings don’t have the issue we’ve experienced with some Marker bindings where the heel closes part way but does not completely lock. The metal-plated AFD provides both strong power transfer from boot to ski, as well as a high level of durability compared to plastic options found elsewhere.
These are very similar to the STH2 16, and like the 16-DIN version, they’re much easier to click into in deep snow than any of the Marker bindings we’ve used. First, the rotating heel piece of the Pivot bindings can be a bit of a nuisance in deep snow. For more on elasticity, travel, DIN, etc. The mechanism is solid, and does not result in a difference in toe height (boot angle). If so, what are the implications of the low height of the Attacks for ordinary resort skiing? We have, however, had a few pre-release issues with STH 13’s when set at the higher end of their DIN range, so if you are running your DIN at 11, 12, or 13, you might consider bumping up to the STH2 16. You don't have to race in PyeongChang to enjoy the best ski technology ever made. Toe wing adjustment to grip front of the ski boot – at what point is it set correctly? Modern release value settings are now standardized by the International Standards Organization (ISO). Hey Troy, Speaking from the perspective of a rocky mtn ski shop, I have not had many issue with the griffons that I can remember. That is the only Attack binding compatible with WTR available for retail. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The Warden’s toe piece doesn’t clear snow as well as the STH2, but the Warden still seems easier to step into in deep snow than the Jester. But once you learn how to do it (or if you aren’t frequently swapping boots or adjusting your DIN settings) then this is a minor factor or a non-factor. With better compatibility, bindings are blurring the lines between alpine and alpine touring. SKI highly recommends only skiing in boots and bindings with the same ISO compatibility and have been properly installed and adjusted by a professional ski technician.
If anyone could help plug that knowledge gap I assume it would be you guys. I can tell you about the ease of use of the knee bindings…they are very difficult.
I'd say go for 16 if you are either over 150 lbs, aggressive/expert skier, or both.
I read that marker has a complaint from the European community for dangerous attacks.
If you are light, or small, it can be impossible to click in the heel. The oversized toe piece wings swallow the front of the boot, providing seamless energy transmission to the ski when paired with the beefy heel piece. We've also listed alternative bindings that use similar technology of those reviewed but have different release values to accommodate different body shapes, abilities, and budgets. So Salomon STH2 WTR 13 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Marker Jester 16, as seen on the chart below. My boot can move up and down in toe piece and causes a clicking sensation. Enjoys skiing fast & craft beer. Most binding heel pieces need to be adjusted to accommodate different boot sole lengths, which is commonly called a binding’s forward pressure. This binding was awarded a SKI Editor's Choice award in 2019. A new binding that is potentially the missing variable for the one-ski, one-boot equation for uphill skiing enthusiasts.
Hi, I just bought some of the new Revolt 121s (so stoked) and am looking for some bindings to put on them. We’ve also included some of our reviewers’ personal experiences with some of these bindings, and we’ll continue to update this piece as more bindings hit the market, and as we are able to get more time testing some of these bindings. No warranties in the past few years that I can think of, and I like the binding a lot as long as you don’t have a super thick touring sole. As you guys get deeper on this topic, I would love for some more information on differences in binding safety. The old (non-WTR or Grip Walk) Look Pivot 14 was a favorite of many Blister reviewers, thanks to its elasticity and consistent release. But the Tyrolia toe doesn’t clear snow as easily as the Salomon STH2. Blister, not a single comment about movement in the toe piece? It’s only compatible with alpine and Grip Walk soles, but it’s got a very good range of adjustment to fit different boot sole lengths, as well as a low stack height.
Rubber soles are a growing trend in the alpine market as well, which might make require replacing a non MNC binding in the next few years if you upgrade boots.
Marker’s flagship Jester binding is still the industry standard for all-mountain … The biggest reason to choose the Warden over the STH2 is if you intend to routinely use AT boots with 9523 boot soles (i.e., not WTR, Grip Walk, or standard alpine soles) because these types of boots require an MNC (multi-norm compatible) binding like the Warden.
We’ve also found that the Tyrolia heels are much easier to open and close, especially in soft snow, than any of the Marker Royal Family bindings, and the Tyrolia bindings don’t have the issue we’ve experienced with some Marker bindings where the heel closes part way but does not completely lock. The metal-plated AFD provides both strong power transfer from boot to ski, as well as a high level of durability compared to plastic options found elsewhere.
These are very similar to the STH2 16, and like the 16-DIN version, they’re much easier to click into in deep snow than any of the Marker bindings we’ve used. First, the rotating heel piece of the Pivot bindings can be a bit of a nuisance in deep snow. For more on elasticity, travel, DIN, etc. The mechanism is solid, and does not result in a difference in toe height (boot angle). If so, what are the implications of the low height of the Attacks for ordinary resort skiing? We have, however, had a few pre-release issues with STH 13’s when set at the higher end of their DIN range, so if you are running your DIN at 11, 12, or 13, you might consider bumping up to the STH2 16. You don't have to race in PyeongChang to enjoy the best ski technology ever made. Toe wing adjustment to grip front of the ski boot – at what point is it set correctly? Modern release value settings are now standardized by the International Standards Organization (ISO). Hey Troy, Speaking from the perspective of a rocky mtn ski shop, I have not had many issue with the griffons that I can remember. That is the only Attack binding compatible with WTR available for retail. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The Warden’s toe piece doesn’t clear snow as well as the STH2, but the Warden still seems easier to step into in deep snow than the Jester. But once you learn how to do it (or if you aren’t frequently swapping boots or adjusting your DIN settings) then this is a minor factor or a non-factor. With better compatibility, bindings are blurring the lines between alpine and alpine touring. SKI highly recommends only skiing in boots and bindings with the same ISO compatibility and have been properly installed and adjusted by a professional ski technician.
If anyone could help plug that knowledge gap I assume it would be you guys. I can tell you about the ease of use of the knee bindings…they are very difficult.
I'd say go for 16 if you are either over 150 lbs, aggressive/expert skier, or both.
I read that marker has a complaint from the European community for dangerous attacks.
If you are light, or small, it can be impossible to click in the heel. The oversized toe piece wings swallow the front of the boot, providing seamless energy transmission to the ski when paired with the beefy heel piece. We've also listed alternative bindings that use similar technology of those reviewed but have different release values to accommodate different body shapes, abilities, and budgets. So Salomon STH2 WTR 13 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Marker Jester 16, as seen on the chart below. My boot can move up and down in toe piece and causes a clicking sensation. Enjoys skiing fast & craft beer. Most binding heel pieces need to be adjusted to accommodate different boot sole lengths, which is commonly called a binding’s forward pressure. This binding was awarded a SKI Editor's Choice award in 2019. A new binding that is potentially the missing variable for the one-ski, one-boot equation for uphill skiing enthusiasts.
Hi, I just bought some of the new Revolt 121s (so stoked) and am looking for some bindings to put on them. We’ve also included some of our reviewers’ personal experiences with some of these bindings, and we’ll continue to update this piece as more bindings hit the market, and as we are able to get more time testing some of these bindings. No warranties in the past few years that I can think of, and I like the binding a lot as long as you don’t have a super thick touring sole. As you guys get deeper on this topic, I would love for some more information on differences in binding safety. The old (non-WTR or Grip Walk) Look Pivot 14 was a favorite of many Blister reviewers, thanks to its elasticity and consistent release. But the Tyrolia toe doesn’t clear snow as easily as the Salomon STH2. Blister, not a single comment about movement in the toe piece? It’s only compatible with alpine and Grip Walk soles, but it’s got a very good range of adjustment to fit different boot sole lengths, as well as a low stack height.
The 16 also has some extra metal in the heel, but it's mostly cosmetic. Furthermore, there are many myths, bits of misinformation, passionate defenders, and very vocal detractors of certain bindings, which makes it even harder to get clear on what the actual characteristics are of these bindings, and how they really differ. Plus, with a slew of brake sizes and DIN options, there’s a Tyrolia Attack2 option for every skier. Much harder to engage than the Griffons or the Jester. Open Wear Open One 3L Shell Jacket & Pants, http://blistergearreview.com/at-binding-reviews/bindings-201, Stack Height (how far off the ski the toe and heel of your boot will be when in the binding), Toe and Heel Elasticity / Travel (The amount of distance a binding can move before the boot clears — i.e., “releases from” — a binding. And if you need more boot compatibility options, check out the Attack2 14 AT — it’s a little heavier and more expensive, but it is compatible with ISO Alpine 5355, WTR, Grip Walk, and ISO Alpine Touring 9523 boots. All bindings should be professionally installed and adjusted by certified technicians at your local ski shop.
I ski every day of the season and almost never release, don’t care about release features, ease of step in is important but having play in my binding is intolerable and overrules everything else. and they gave a link to the previous generation of STH binding heal pieces for the forward pressure setup, which is now different on the STH2 model i think as it is a guardian style heal now with a different track adjustment setup than before as well. I didn’t have my boot to provide them and as a consequence need to set the binding up properly with respect to the following: 1. The Attack 14 AT is compatible with WTR. The Duke PT’s unique toe piece is a major step forward for the German ski binding manufacturer. It is a part of a ski binding’s toe piece designed to assist releasing the ski boot during a twisting fall. Tyrolia updated the entire Attack series for 17/18 with a new adjustable toe mechanism that works with Grip Walk boots, and the bindings came back unchanged for 18/19. It's … They are only skied a few time a year. Any thoughts on that? I would normally expect there to be little to no vertical play in the toe or heal so as to maintain contact with the contact points under the ski boot?? But we hope that it will help to clear up some confusion and allow all of us to make more informed decisions. All of the bindings featured in this article with a "GW" in the title are compatible with Alpine and GripWalk soles.
See all of the winners. I was unhurt, mostly. The data presented is for information purposes only.
Rubber soles are a growing trend in the alpine market as well, which might make require replacing a non MNC binding in the next few years if you upgrade boots.
Marker’s flagship Jester binding is still the industry standard for all-mountain … The biggest reason to choose the Warden over the STH2 is if you intend to routinely use AT boots with 9523 boot soles (i.e., not WTR, Grip Walk, or standard alpine soles) because these types of boots require an MNC (multi-norm compatible) binding like the Warden.
We’ve also found that the Tyrolia heels are much easier to open and close, especially in soft snow, than any of the Marker Royal Family bindings, and the Tyrolia bindings don’t have the issue we’ve experienced with some Marker bindings where the heel closes part way but does not completely lock. The metal-plated AFD provides both strong power transfer from boot to ski, as well as a high level of durability compared to plastic options found elsewhere.
These are very similar to the STH2 16, and like the 16-DIN version, they’re much easier to click into in deep snow than any of the Marker bindings we’ve used. First, the rotating heel piece of the Pivot bindings can be a bit of a nuisance in deep snow. For more on elasticity, travel, DIN, etc. The mechanism is solid, and does not result in a difference in toe height (boot angle). If so, what are the implications of the low height of the Attacks for ordinary resort skiing? We have, however, had a few pre-release issues with STH 13’s when set at the higher end of their DIN range, so if you are running your DIN at 11, 12, or 13, you might consider bumping up to the STH2 16. You don't have to race in PyeongChang to enjoy the best ski technology ever made. Toe wing adjustment to grip front of the ski boot – at what point is it set correctly? Modern release value settings are now standardized by the International Standards Organization (ISO). Hey Troy, Speaking from the perspective of a rocky mtn ski shop, I have not had many issue with the griffons that I can remember. That is the only Attack binding compatible with WTR available for retail. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The Warden’s toe piece doesn’t clear snow as well as the STH2, but the Warden still seems easier to step into in deep snow than the Jester. But once you learn how to do it (or if you aren’t frequently swapping boots or adjusting your DIN settings) then this is a minor factor or a non-factor. With better compatibility, bindings are blurring the lines between alpine and alpine touring. SKI highly recommends only skiing in boots and bindings with the same ISO compatibility and have been properly installed and adjusted by a professional ski technician.
If anyone could help plug that knowledge gap I assume it would be you guys. I can tell you about the ease of use of the knee bindings…they are very difficult.
I'd say go for 16 if you are either over 150 lbs, aggressive/expert skier, or both.
I read that marker has a complaint from the European community for dangerous attacks.
If you are light, or small, it can be impossible to click in the heel. The oversized toe piece wings swallow the front of the boot, providing seamless energy transmission to the ski when paired with the beefy heel piece. We've also listed alternative bindings that use similar technology of those reviewed but have different release values to accommodate different body shapes, abilities, and budgets. So Salomon STH2 WTR 13 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Marker Jester 16, as seen on the chart below. My boot can move up and down in toe piece and causes a clicking sensation. Enjoys skiing fast & craft beer. Most binding heel pieces need to be adjusted to accommodate different boot sole lengths, which is commonly called a binding’s forward pressure. This binding was awarded a SKI Editor's Choice award in 2019. A new binding that is potentially the missing variable for the one-ski, one-boot equation for uphill skiing enthusiasts.
Hi, I just bought some of the new Revolt 121s (so stoked) and am looking for some bindings to put on them. We’ve also included some of our reviewers’ personal experiences with some of these bindings, and we’ll continue to update this piece as more bindings hit the market, and as we are able to get more time testing some of these bindings. No warranties in the past few years that I can think of, and I like the binding a lot as long as you don’t have a super thick touring sole. As you guys get deeper on this topic, I would love for some more information on differences in binding safety. The old (non-WTR or Grip Walk) Look Pivot 14 was a favorite of many Blister reviewers, thanks to its elasticity and consistent release. But the Tyrolia toe doesn’t clear snow as easily as the Salomon STH2. Blister, not a single comment about movement in the toe piece? It’s only compatible with alpine and Grip Walk soles, but it’s got a very good range of adjustment to fit different boot sole lengths, as well as a low stack height.
I would not recommend seeking out a Pivot 18 for that purpose if you dont already own it. I don’t mind the new Look SPX 12 but not a fan of the BIG new WTR toe peice. SKI highly recommends only skiing in boots and bindings that have been properly installed and adjusted by a professional ski technician. I totally believe that in any other binding I would be having reconstructive knee surgery this summer. However, Paul Forward has had some pre-releases on the STH 13, which has a very similar heel to the Warden, so psychologically, he personally doesn’t feel quite as comfortable skiing the 13 heels when running a higher DIN setting (11, 12, or 13).
TOP